I larned some sad intelligence today from the really little field of Amerindian orthography and literacy surveys. The linguistic anthropologist Willard Walker
, whose spectacular work on the Cherokee syllabary is the most serious scholarly survey on the theme, passed forth belatedly last month. Dr. Walker, who was a prof emeritus of anthropology at Wesleyan University and was one of that section 's laminitises, was 82.
One of the more singular facts about literacy in colonial and pre-modern North U.S. is the extreme dearth of independently developed penning systems and numeric notations. In contrast to West Africa, where there are XII of illustrations of persons making autochthonous books after being exposed to the Roman or Arabic books, there are comparatively few autochthonic North American playscripts, and of these, the Cherokee syllabary ( in which each mark encodes a syllable instead than a individual phoneme ) holds been one of the most successful. Walker 's work was an attempt to explicate the development of Cherokee authorship that was respectful to Sequoyah ( George Invitee ), the playscript 's discoverer, while guiding clear of great man ' fallacies and assay to understand the sociocultural context of the playscript 's design and credence ( Walker 1969, 1984a, 1984b, 1985; Walker and Sarbaugh 1993 ). A major component of his life 's work was comparative, demonstrating the shipways in which Cherokee involvement in literacy contrasted with sedate ambivalency about the pattern of encoding unwritten traditions in transcription among many other peoples of the Americas.
Over the geezerhood I 've been enquire numerous times to call my favorite numeric notation system. Ab initio I believed that was but a eccentric interrogation, then again, I calculate that people in picture surveys must get inquired what their favorite movies are day in and day out, and that people are but looking for a fashion into my discipline, a hook, if you will. So for the past duet of eld, I 've sayed them about the Cherokee numerals
My narration here, which is one that Walker touched on only briefly, is that where the Cherokee syllabary flourished ( and keeps to expand today ), the numbers that Sequoya developed were ne'er accepted. While the syllabary is well-suited for penning the Tsalagi ( Cherokee ) language, the Western numbers answered for penning Numbers, so the Cherokee council voted not to espouse them. They endure merely in two papers in the Gilcrease Museum in Tulsa, Oklahoma - the only grounds we hold for the creation of an endemic North American numeric notation. Unfortunately, none of the standard texts on numeric notation presently printed ( hem ) reference them.
The other verily orderly thing about the Cherokee numbers is that they exhibit a singular structural resemblance to the system of numbers applied by the Jurchin
of northeast Cathay, who developed a book in the Twelfth century, and who were afterward cognized ( famously ) as the Manchu when they governed PRC. If you follow that connect you see that the Jurchin system holds special marks for 1-19, so every decennary from 20-90, so subscribes for the higher powers of 10. There is no possibility that Sequoyah cognise of this system - rattlingly, no one in the Western macrocosm maked until the Ninetieses - but the Cherokee system parallels it in closely every point - although naturally the marks are totally different. If I were to do the instance for cognitive restraints interacting with cultural and lingual variance to produce singular and unexpected analogues, this would be a example. Theoretically, so, the Cherokee numbers are highly important even though no one really utilise them, equally far as we can state.
I ever conceived that I might reach Dr. Walker to speak to him about the numbers, which he discourse justly in passing. Certainly I would hold been thrilled if he read the few pages of my book that I consecrated to the theme and holded anything to state about them. Alas, that will ne'er pass now.
The clock in my office
bears Cherokee numbers - some forward-looking somebody sells them through Cafepress. It is the only text ' with the numbers readily available to anyone today. Tomorrow, in honor of the work of Doctor Walker, it will be soundless.
Walker, Tungsten 1969. Notes on native inditing systems and the designing of native literacy programmes. Anthropological Linguistics: 148-166.
. 1984a. The Designing of Indigen Literacy Programs you bet Literacy Came to the Cherokees. Anthropological Linguistics: 161-169.
. 1984b. Literacy, Wampums, the Gdabuk, you said it Indians in the Interahamwe NE Read. Anthropological Linguistics: 42-52.
. 1985. The Roles of Samuel A Worcester and Elias Boudinot in the Growth of a Printed Cherokee Syllabic Literature. International Diary of American Linguistics: 610-612.
Walker, Tungsten, and J Sarbaugh. 1993. The early history of the Cherokee syllabary. Ethnohistory: 70-94.
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
